Okram Henry Singh v. Thangjam Arunkumar & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
present application is allowed
Judgment
statement. This prayer is vehemently objected by Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel for the petitioner on the ground that the statutory period for filing written objection has already lapsed. In view of the prayer made by the learned counsel for the respondent No. 2, list this case again on 23rd September, 2022 for consideration of the prayer as well as the objection raised by the learned counsel for the parties. JUDGE Item No. 23 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(El. Pet.)No. 123 of 2022 Okram Henry Singh -Versus- ....Applicant Thangjam Arunkumar & 2 Ors ....Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH BEFORE
14.09.2022 Heard Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel appearing for the applicant, Mr. H. S Paonam, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. B. R Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the contesting respondent No. 1, Mr. Jeson, learned counsel the respondent No. 2 and Mrs. Ayangleima, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3. The present application has been filed seeking leave to allow the applicant to file replication to the written objection filed by the respondent No. 1 in MC(El.Pet.) No. 55 of 2022. Mr. H. S Paonam, learned senior counsel appearing for the contesting respondent No. 1 submitted that he has no objection in allowing the application. In view of the above, the present application is allowed. Misc case stands closed. JUDGE Item No. 24 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(El. Pet.)No. 114 of 2022 Okram Henry Singh -Versus- ....Applicant Thangjam Arunkumar & 2 Ors ....Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH BEFORE
Operative part
14.09.2022 Heard Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel appearing for the applicant, Mr. H. S Paonam, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. B. R Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the contesting respondent No. 1, Mr. Jeson, learned counsel the respondent No. 2 and Mrs. Ayangleima, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3. The present application has been filed seeking leave to allow the applicant to file replication to the written objection filed by the respondent No. 1 in the connected El. Pet. No. 1 of 2022. Mr. H. S Paonam, learned senior counsel appearing for the contesting respondent No. 1 submitted that he has no objection in allowing the present application. In view of the above submission made, the present application is allowed. Misc case stands closed. JUDGE Item No. 26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(El. Pet.)No. 50 of 2022 Thangjam Arunkumar -Versus- ....Applicant Okram Henry Singh & 2 Ors ....Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH BEFORE
14.09.2022 Heard Mr. H. S Paonam, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. B. R Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the applicant, Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1, Mr. Jeson, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 and Mrs. Ayangleima, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3. Written statement on behalf of the respondent No. 1 had been filed and the same is on record. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 2 & 3 submitted that they will not file any written objection in the present application. Mr. H. S Paonam, learned senior counsel appearing for the applicant seeks a week’s time for filing replication to the written objection filed by the respondent No.
As prayed for, list this case again on 23rd September, 2022. JUDGE Item No. 27 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(El. Pet.)No. 55 of 2022 Okram Henry Singh ....Applicant -Versus- Thangjam Arunkumar & 2 Ors ....Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH BEFORE
14.09.2022 Heard Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel appearing for the applicant, Mr. H. S Paonam, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. B. R Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1, Mr. Jeson, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 and Mrs. Ayangleima, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3. It is submitted at the Bar that exchange of pleadings are complete. In view of the above, list this case again on 23rd September, 2022. JUDGE Item No. 29 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(El. Pet.)No. 67 of 2022 Thangjam Arunkumar ....Applicant -Versus- Yumkham Irabot Singh & 2 Ors ....Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH BEFORE
14.09.2022 Heard Mr. H. S Paonam, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. B. R Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the applicant, Mr. Jeson, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1, Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 and Mrs. Ayangleima, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1 seeks one week’s further time for filing written objection. As prayed for, list this case again on 23rd September, 2022. JUDGE Item No. 25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL El. Recr. Pet. No. 16 of 2022 Thangjam Arunkumar ....Petitioner -Versus- Yumkham Irabot Singh & 2 Ors ....Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH BEFORE
14.09.2022 Heard Mr. H. S Paonam, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. S. Gunabanta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr. Jeson, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1, Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 and Mrs. Ayangleima, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 3. Learned senior counsel appearing petitioner seeks one week’s time for filing replication to the written statement filed by the respondent Nos. 1 & 2. As prayed for, list this case again on 23rd September, 2022. JUDGE Item No. 28 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL El. Pet. No. 24 of 2022 Yumkham Irabot Singh ....Petitioner -Versus- Thangjam Arunkumar & 2 Ors ....Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH BEFORE
14.09.2022 Heard Mr. Jeson, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr. H. S Paonam, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. S. Gunabanta, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1, Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 and Mrs. Ayangleima, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3. Written statements on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 & 2 had been filed and the same is on record. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 3 submitted that the respondent No. 3 will not file written statement. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks one week’s time for filing replication to the written statements filed by the respondent Nos. 1 & 2. As prayed for, list this case again on 23rd September, 2022. JUDGE Item No. 30 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL El. Recr. Pet. No. 1 of 2022 Thangjam Arunkumar ....Petitioner -Versus- Okram Henry Singh & 2 Ors ....Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH BEFORE
14.09.2022 Heard Mr. H.S Paonam, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. S. Gunabanta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1, Mr. Jeson, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 and Mrs. Ayangleima, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2 seeks one week’s further time for filing written statement. As prayed for, list this case again on 23rd September, 2022. JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: present application is allowed
Which court decided this case, and when?
Manipur High Court, on 14 Sep 2022. The bench was AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.