Ahanthem Shanjoy Singh v. Sanasam Premchandra Singh & Ors.
Case Details
Summary
A structured summary for this judgment hasn’t been prepared yet. The full text is below.
Precedent status
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.
Original judgment text
Mr. Serto T Kom, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submitted that the petitioner is not filing any replication to the written statement filed by respondent No. 2 & 8. Mr. Leo Rommel, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 3, seeks 2 (two) weeks’ time for filing written statement. As prayed for, list this case again on 22.09.2022. JUDGE joshua KH. JOSHUA MARING KH. JOSHUA MARING 13:41:47 +05'30' IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(El.Pet.) No. 116 of 2022 Item No. 26 Ahanthem Shanjoy Singh - Versus – Sanasam Premchandra Singh & 3 Ors. …..Applicant/s .... Respondent/s BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
06.09.2022 Heard Mr. Serto T Kom, learned counsel appearing for the applicant, Mr. N. Mahendra, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 1, Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 2 and Mr. Leo Rommel, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 3. The present application has been filed seeking leave to allow the application to file written statement in the connected El.Recr.Pet. No. 7 of 2022. Mr. N. Mahendra, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 1, contesting respondent, submitted that he has no objection in allowing the present application. In view of the submission made above, the present application is allowed. Registry is directed to put on record the written statement filed by respondent No. 1 in the connected El.Recr.Pet. No. 7 of 2022. Misc. Case stands disposed of. joshua JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(El.Pet.) No. 117 of 2022 Item No. 27 Ahanthem Shanjoy Singh - Versus – Sanasam Premchandra Singh & 8 Ors. …..Applicant/s .... Respondent/s BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
06.09.2022 applicant. Heard Mr. Serto T Kom, learned counsel appearing for the The present application has been filed seeking leave to allow the applicant to file replication to the written statement filed by respondent No. 1 in El.Pet. No. 13 of 2022. Mr. N. Mahendra, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 1 in El.Pet. No. 13 of 2022, submitted that he has no objection in allowing the present application. In view of the submission made above, the present application is allowed. Registry is directed to put on record the replication of the applicant in the connected election petition. joshua JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(El.Pet.) No. 99 of 2022 Item No. 28 Ningthoujam Mangi - Versus – Sanasam Premchandra Singh & 3 Ors. …..Applicant/s .... Respondent/s BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
06.09.2022 applicant. Heard Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel appearing for the The present application has been filed seeking leave to allow the applicant to file written statement in the connected El.Recr.Pet. No. 7 of 2022. Mr. N. Mahendra, learned counsel appearing petitioner in El.Recr.Pet. No. 7 of 2022, submitted that he has no objection in allowing the present application. In view of the submission made above, the present application is allowed. Registry is directed to put on record the written statement of respondent No. 1 in El.Recr.Pet. No. 7 of 2022. Misc. Case stands disposed of. joshua JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL El.Recr.Pet. No. 7 of 2022 Item No. 29 Sanasam Premchandra Singh - Versus – Ahanthem Sanjoy Singh & 3 Ors. …..Applicant/s .... Respondent/s BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
06.09.2022 Written statement on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 & 2 has been filed and the same is on record. Mr. Leo Rommel, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 3, seeks 2 (two) weeks’ time for filing written statement on behalf of respondent No. 3. None appeared for respondent No. 4 despite service of notice. Accordingly, the present petition is proceeded ex-parte against respondent No. 4. As prayed for, list this case again on 22.09.2022. joshua JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL El.Recr.Pet. No. 8 of 2022 Item No. 30 Ningthoujam Mangi - Versus – Ahanthem Sanjoy Singh & 3 Ors. …..Applicant/s .... Respondent/s BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
06.09.2022 Heard Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr. Serto T Kom, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 1, Mr. N. Mahendra, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 2 and Mr. Leo Rommel, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.
3. notice. None appeared for respondent No. 4 despite service of The learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 3 seeks 2 (two) weeks’ time for filing their respective written statements. As prayed for, list this case again on 22.09.2022. joshua JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(El.Pet.) No. 23 of 2022 Item No. 31 MD. S. Daulat Khan - Versus – Ahanthem Sanjoy Singh & 8 Ors. …..Applicant/s .... Respondent/s BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
06.09.2022 Heard Mr. Dev Dutt, learned counsel appearing for the applicant, Mr. Serto T Kom, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 1, Mr. N. Mahendra, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 2, Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 3 and Mr. Leo Rommel, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 4 The present application has been filed by the Chief Electoral Officers, Manipur with a prayer for allowing the applicant to shift the EVMs and VVPATs involved/used in 29-Kumbi Assembly Constituency in the 12th Manipur Legislative Assembly Election 2022 from the designated strong room to the accredited factories for necessary updation. The learned counsel appearing for the parties in the connection election petition and the election recrimination petition submitted that no issue is involved in connection with the EVMs and VVPATs in the pending election petition and election recrimination petition and they have no objection in allowing the present application. In view of the submission made above, the present application is allowed. Misc. case stands disposed of. JUDGE joshua