✦ Manipur High Court

(Through video conference) v. State of Manipur

MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C) No. 700 of 2017MURALIDARAN

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

writ petition is dismissed as infructuous

Judgment

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MV MURALIDARAN

Operative part

04.03.2022 [1] Heard Mr. DR RK Deepak, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. Monomala, learned GA for the State respondents and Mr. I. Denning, learned counsel for the private respondent. [2] Both the counsels represented that in view of the order passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench in WA No.4 of 2019, this writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, they have prayed to close the writ petition as infructuous. [3] Recording the submissions made by both the parties, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. [4] Registry is directed to issue copy of this order to both the parties to their Whatsapp/e-mail. JUDGE John Kom

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Manipur High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C) No. 700 of 2017). ← Search more judgments