Okram Henry Singh v. Thangjam Arunkumar & Ors
Judgment
On the other hand, Mr. M. Gunedhor, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2 seeks ten days’ time for filing written statement on behalf of the respondent No. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submitted that he will not file any replication to the written statement filed by the respondent No. 3. In view of the above, list this case again on 14th September, 2022 along with the replication and written statement filed by the parties. JUDGE Item No.21 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(El.Pet) No. 56 of 2022 Okram Henry Singh -Versus- ....Applicant Thangjam Arunkumar & 2 Ors ....Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH BEFORE
02.09.2022 Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that as the respondent No. 1 in the connected election petition has file written statement, the present application has become infructuous and the matter can be closed. In view of the submission made above, the present application is hereby closed. JUDGE Item No.23 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(El.Pet.) No. 50 of 2022 Thangjam Arunkumar -Versus- Okram Henry Singh & 2 Ors ....Applicant ....Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH BEFORE
02.09.2022 Heard Mr. B. R Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the applicant, Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1, Mr. M. Gunedhor, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2 and Mrs. Ayangleima, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant prayed for taking up this matter after one week so as to enable him to go through the objection filed by the respondent No. 1 and to file replication, if so advised. JUDGE Item No.20 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(El.Pet.) No. 55 of 2022 Okram Henry Singh -Versus- Thangjam Arunkumar & 2 Ors ....Applicant ....Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH BEFORE
02.09.2022 Heard Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel appearing for the applicant, Mr. B. R Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1, Mr. M. Gunedhor, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2 and Mrs. Ayangleima, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 2 & 3 that they will not be filing any objection in the present application. Written objection on behalf of the respondent No. 1 has been filed and is placed on record. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant seeks one week’s time to go through the objection and to file replication, if necessary. As prayed for, list this case again no 14th September,
2022. JUDGE Item No. 22 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL El.Recr. Pet. No. 1 of 2022 Thangjam Arunkumar -Versus- Okram Henry Singh & 2 Ors ....Petitioner ....Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH BEFORE
02.09.2022 Mr. M. Gunedhor, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2 seeks 10 (ten) days’ further time for filing written objection on behalf of the respondent No. 2. Mrs. Ayangleima, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 3 submitted that the respondent No. 3 is not filing any written objection. Mr. B. R Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks ten days’ time for filing replication to the written statement filed by the respondent No. 1. In view of the above, list this case again on 14th September, 2022. JUDGE Item No.24 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(El.Pet.) No. 91 of 2022 Okram Henry Singh -Versus- ....Applicant Thangjam Arunkumar & 2 Ors ....Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH BEFORE
02.09.2022 Heard Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel appearing for the applicant, Mr. B. R Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1, Mr. M. Gunedhor, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2 and Mrs. Ayangleima, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 3. The present application has been filed seeking leave to allow the respondent No. 1 to file written statement in El. Recr. Pet. No. 16 of 2022. Mr. B. R Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the contesting respondent No. 1/petitioner in election recrimination submitted that he has no objection in allowing the present application since written statement on behalf of the respondent No. 1 has been filed within 90 (ninety) days. In view of the submission made above, the present application is closed. Registry is directed to put on record the written statement of the respondent No. 1. JUDGE Item No.25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL El. Recr. Pet. No. 16 of 2022 Thangjam Arunkumar -Versus- ....Petitioner Yumkham Irabot Singh & 2 Ors ....Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH BEFORE
02.09.2022 Mr. M. Gunedhor, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1 submitted that written statement on behalf of the respondent No. 1 will be filed during the course of the day. Mrs. Ayangleima, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 3 submitted that the respondent No. 3 will not file any written objection in this case. Mr. B. R Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks one week’s time for filing replication to the written statement filed by the respondent No. 2. In view of the above, list this case again on 14th September, 2022. Kim JUDGE Item No.26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(El.Pet.) No. 67 of 2022 Thangjam Arunkumar -Versus- Yumkham Irabot Singh & 2 Ors ....Applicant ....Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH BEFORE
02.09.2022 Heard Mr. B. R Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the applicant, Mr. M. Gunedhor, learned counsel appearing for the contesting respondent No. 1, Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel appearing respondent No. 2 and Mrs. Ayangleima, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1 seeks ten days’ further time for filing written objection. As prayed for, list this case again on 14th September,
2022. JUDGE Item No.27 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL El. Pet. No. 24 of 2022 Yumkham Irabot Singh -Versus- ....Petitioner Thangjam Arunkumar & 2 Ors ....Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH BEFORE
02.09.2022 Heard Mr. M. Gunedhor, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Mr. B. R Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1 and Mrs. Ayangleima, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 3 seeks ten days’ further time for filing their respective written statements. Mr. M. Gunedhor, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks sometime for filing replication to the written statement filed by the respondent No. 2. In view of the above submission made, list this case again no 14th September, 2022. JUDGE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.