Yengkhom Surchandra Singh v. Mayanglambam Rameshwar Singh & Ors.
Case Details
Summary
A structured summary for this judgment hasn’t been prepared yet. The full text is below.
Precedent status
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.
Original judgment text
B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH 31-08-2022 Heard Mr. N. Jotendro, learned senior counsel assisted by Syed Murtaza Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. N. Kumarjit, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. N. Zequeson, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1. The counsel for the respondents No. 4 and 5 appeared on earlier occasion, however, none of the Advocates appeared today. In respect of respondents No. 2 and 3, nobody appeared despite service of notice. Accordingly, the present application will be proceeded ex-parte against the respondents No. 2 and 3. The counsel for the petitioner seeks two week time for filing replication to the written statement filed by respondent No. 1. As prayed for, list this case again on 14-09-2022. Devananda JUDGE SHOUGRA KPAM DEVANAN DA SINGH SHOUGRAKPAM DEVANANDA SINGH 15:46:18 +05'30' IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL IN. 20 MC(El. Petn.) No. 103 of 2022 Mayanglambam Rameshwar Singh Vs. … Applicant Yengkhom Surchandra Singh & ors. … Respondents B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH 31-08-2022 Heard Mr. N. Kumarjit, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. N. Zequeson, learned counsel appearing for the applicant and Mr. N. Jotendro, learned senior counsel assisted by Syd Murtaza Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the contesting respondent No. 1/ petitioner in the election petition. The present application had been filed seeking leave to allow the respondent No. 1 to file written statement in the connected El. Petn. No. 5 of 2022. Mr. N. Jotendro, learned senior counsel submitted that the respondent No. 1/ petitioner in the election petition has no objection in allowing the present application as the said written statement had been filed within 90 days. In view of the submission made above, the present application is allowed. Registry is directed to place on record the written statement of the respondent No. 1. Misc. case stands disposed of. Devananda JUDGE SHOUGRA KPAM DEVANAN DA SINGH SHOUGRAKPAM DEVANANDA SINGH 15:46:40 +05'30' IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL IN. 21 El. Recr. Petn. No. 6 of 2022 Mayanglambam Rameshwar Singh Vs. … Petitioner Yengkhom Surchandra Singh & ors. … Respondents B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH 31-08-2022 Heard Mr. N. Kumarjit, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. N. Zequeson, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. N. Jotendro, learned senior counsel assisted by Syed Murtaza Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1. The counsel for the respondent No. 1 seeks two week time for filing written statement. As prayed for, list this case again on 14-09-2022. Devananda JUDGE SHOUGRA KPAM DEVANAN DA SINGH SHOUGRAKPAM DEVANANDA SINGH 15:47:00 +05'30' IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL IN. 22 MC(El. Petn.) No. 15 of 2022 Md. S. Daulat Khan Vs. … Applicant Yengkhom Surchandra Singh & ors. … Respondents B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH 31-08-2022 Heard Mr. Dev Dutt, learned counsel appearing for the applicant, Mr. N. Jotendro, learned senior counsel assisted by Syed Murtaza Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. N. Kumarjit, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. N. Zequeson, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2. None appeared for the other respondents, despite service of notice. The present application had been filed by the Joint Electoral Officer, Manipur with a prayer for allowing the applicant to shift the EVMs and VVPATs involved/ used in the 37-Kakching Assembly Constituency in the 12th Manipur Legislative Assembly Election, 2022 from the designated strong room to the accredited factories for necessary updation. It has been submitted at the bar by the learned counsel appearing for the parties that there is no issue involved in connection with the said EVMs and VVPATs in the connected election petition as well as in the connected election recrimination petition and accordingly, they have no objection in allowing the present application. In view of the submission made above, the present application is allowed. Misc. case stands closed. Devananda JUDGE SHOUGR AKPAM DEVANAN DA SINGH SHOUGRAKPAM DEVANANDA SINGH 15:47:18 +05'30' IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL IN. 23 MC(El. Petn.) No. 69 of 2022 Mayanglambam Rameshwar Singh Vs. … Applicant Yengkhom Surchandra Singh & ors. … Respondents B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH 31-08-2022 Heard Mr. N. Kumarjit, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. N. Zequeson, learned counsel appearing for the applicant and Mr. N. Jotendro, learned senior counsel assisted by Syed Murtaza Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1. It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that since the respondent No. 1 has already filed written statement in the connected El. Petn. No. 5 of 2022, the present application has become infructuous and accordingly, a prayer has been made for closing the present application. In view of the submission made above, the present application is hereby closed as infructuous. Devananda JUDGE SHOUGRA KPAM DEVANAN DA SINGH SHOUGRAKPAM DEVANANDA SINGH 15:47:42 +05'30' IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL IN. 24 MC(El. Petn.) No. 70 of 2022 Mayanglambam Rameshwar Singh Vs. … Applicant Yengkhom Surchandra Singh & ors. … Respondents B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH 31-08-2022 Heard Mr. N. Kumarjit, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. N. Zequeson, learned counsel appearing for the applicant and Mr. N. Jotendro, learned senior counsel assisted by Syed Murtaza Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1. None appeared for the other respondents, despite service of notice. The counsel for the respondent No. 1 seeks two week time for filing written objection. As prayed for, list this case again on 14-09-2022. Devananda JUDGE