M/S v. HANGARAKI
Case at a glance
- Bench
- C M POONACHA
Outcome
Dismissed
writ petition is dismissed reserving liberty to the petitioners to
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
- Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act, 1997 s. 46
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR, SOUHAR CO-OPERATIVE (ABN) COURT, KARNATAKA STATE SOUHARD FEDERAL CO- OPERATIVE LTD, MELLESHWARAM, BENGALURU – 560 055. (NOTICE ISSUED TO R1 & R2 ARE SERVED, BUT UNREPRESENTED) …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT PETITION NO.105303 OF 2021 (CS-DAS) BETWEEN:
1. M/S. VSR MINERALS, SY NO. 6-2-38/6-2-30, WARD NO. 30 P. RAVINDRANATH BUILDING, VIRUPAPUR, GANGAVATHI – 583 227, KOPPAL DISTRICT, REPT. BY ITS PARTNERS.
2. MR. SAIBABU S/O. GARAPATI VENKATRAO, AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
3. RAMUJI S/O. SRINIVAS KELOJI, AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS.
4. MR. SANTOSH S/O. SRINIVAS KELOJI, AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS. (BY SRI BALAGOUDA A. PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: …PETITIONERS HANGARAKI Location: High Court of Karnataka
VIKAS SOUHARD CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, STATION ROAD, HOSAPETE – 583 201, DIST: VIJAYANAGAR, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER.
Operative part
ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR, SOUHAR CO-OPERATIVE (ABN) COURT, KARNATAKA STATE SOUHARD FEDERAL CO- OPERATIVE LTD, MELLESHWARAM, BENGALURU – 560 055. (NOTICE ISSUED TO R1 & R2 ARE SERVED, BUT UNREPRESENTED) …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO, ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OTHER WRIT QUASHING THE AWARD DATED - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:16703 WP No. 105303 of 2021 15/01/2021 PASSED BY THE ADDL. REGISTRAR IN DISPUTE NO.D.R.D/K.RA.SOU.SUM.S.NI/3924/2018-2019 PRODUCED AS PER ANNEXURE-D AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING - B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA) Having regard to the fact that an alternative efficacious remedy is available to the petitioners as provided under Section 46 of the Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act, 1997, the above writ petition is dismissed reserving liberty to the petitioners to avail the alternative remedy as aforementioned. Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE PNV/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 50
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: writ petition is dismissed reserving liberty to the petitioners to
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227; Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act, 1997 — s. 46.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.