SRI. SHIVAKUMAR SHANKARAIAH SHIVAPUJIMUTH v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
Case at a glance
- Bench
- M I ARUN
- Neutral citation
- 2026:KHC:27430
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
- Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act, 1997
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 9547 OF 2025 (CS-RES) BETWEEN:
1. SRI. SHIVAKUMAR SHANKARAIAH SHIVAPUJIMUTH …PETITIONER S/O SHANKARAIAH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/A NO.331/2Ca MUTHGALLI KAKATI BELGAUM-591 113 (BY SRI. ABHISHEK HUDDAR, ADVOCATE) AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF COOPERATION M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001
M/S. PATSON MULTIPURPOSE SOUHARDA SAHAKARI LIMITED BELAGAVI, MAHANTESH NAGAR BELAGAVI, KARNATAKA-590 017 REP BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
JOINT REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY SOUHARDA SAHAKARI DAVA PANCHAYATH KARNATAKA STATE SOUHARDA SAHAKARI - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:27430 WP No. 9547 of 2025 HC-KAR BELAGAVI BENCH, BELAGAVI SANJOGA BUILDING NEAR P AND T QUARTERS DOUBLE ROAD, MAHANTESH NAGAR BELAGAVI-590 016
RECOVERY OFFICER AND JOINT REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED SOUHARDA SAHAKARI SOUDHA NO.68, 17 AND 18TH CROSS MARGOSSA ROAD, MALLESHWARAM BENGALURU-560 055
KEERTHIKUMAR LINGARAJ KANTHUR S/O NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT MAJOR
NIRMALA KEERTHIKUMAR KANTHUR AGED ABOUT MAJOR W/O KEERTHIKUMAR LINGARAJ KANTHUR BOTH RESPONDENT NOS.5 & 6 ARE RESIDING AT NO.1936/A RANI CHENNAMMA ROAD KAKATHI, BELAGAVI- 591113 (BY SRI. YOGESH D.NAIK, AGA FOR R1, R3 & R4; SRI. YASHAVANTH SAJJANAGOUDAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2) …RESPONDENTS THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 28.12.2021, BEARING NO.DRD/K.Ra.Sou. So.Sa.Ni/2962/2021-22 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.3, A - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:27430 WP No. 9547 of 2025 HC-KAR COPY OF WHICH IS HEREIN PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-B AS ILLEGAL AND VOID AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER
1. The petitioner has challenged an award passed against him and few others by respondent no.3 under the provisions of the Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act, 1997 (for short 'the Act'). It is seen that the petitioner is having an alternative and efficacious remedy under Section 46 of the Act.
2. For the aforementioned reasons, the petition dismissed reserving the liberty of the petitioner to approach the appropriate appellate authority in the manner known to law. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE PGG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.