SRI MANJUNATH A G v. SRI SEETHARAGHVA SOUHARDA SHAKARA BANK
Case at a glance
- Bench
- S R KRISHNA KUMAR
- Neutral citation
- 2026:KHC:24047
Outcome
Disposed of
Act, 1997, the petition is hereby disposed of reserving liberty in
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
- Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act, 1997 s. 39
- Limitation Act, 1963 s. 14
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Though several contentions have been urged by both sides in support of their respective claims, having regard to availability of equally efficacious and alternative remedy by way of approaching under Section 39 of Karnataka Souharda Sahakari - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:24047 WP No. 29682…
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 29682 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SRI MANJUNATH A G, S/O GOVINDAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT 3RD CROSS KALLUHOLE ROAD VEERABHADRESHWARA LAYOUT KADURU TOWN CHIKKMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 548 (BY SRI. VINAYA KUMAR P., ADVOCATE) AND: …PETITIONER SRI SEETHARAGHVA SOUHARDA SHAKARA BANK NIYAMITHA HEAD OFFICE: BUS STAND ROAD HOSADURGA - 577 527 REP BY ITS SECRETARY GENERAL MANAGER N MANJUNATH …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. S. LAKSHMINARAYANA, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TOQUASH THE ORDER DTD
30.12.24 BEARING 454/SSSSBN/24-25 ISSUED BY THE - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:24047 WP No. 29682 of 2025 HC-KAR RESPONDENT (PRODUCED AS ANNX-B) AND DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT TO RE-APPOINT THE PETITIONER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER In this petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs: (i) Set aside impugned order dated
12.02.2026 passed in S.C.No.194/2025. As per Annexure-B. (ii) Direct the trial Court to release of the silver articles (390+kg) and cash (Rs.17,41,910/-) seized under PF No.70/2024 dated 28.09.2024 by Kora Police Station which is still in the custody of respondent to the interim custody of the petitioners by imposing any conditions. (iii) Pass such other and further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity.
Operative part
Though several contentions have been urged by both sides in support of their respective claims, having regard to availability of equally efficacious and alternative remedy by way of approaching under Section 39 of Karnataka Souharda Sahakari - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:24047 WP No. 29682 of 2025 HC-KAR Act, 1997, the petition is hereby disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to file an appeal/raise a dispute and take recourse to such remedies as available in law including invoking Section 39 of the Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act, 1997. If the petitioner takes such steps in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today, the petitioner would be entitled to the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act. Subject to the aforesaid directions and liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner, petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Act, 1997, the petition is hereby disposed of reserving liberty in
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227; Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act, 1997 — s. 39; Limitation Act, 1963 — s. 14.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.