✦ Karnataka High Court

SRIPRASHANTH v. SMT. LATHA B.S., AGES ABOUT 27 YEARS

RPFC No. 307 of 2025LALITHA KANNEGANTI

Case at a glance

Bench
LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Neutral citation
2025:KHC:45694

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Accordingly, the RPFC is disposed off for statistical purposes. Registry is directed to return all the documents. Sd/- _________________________ JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI BN/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2

Judgment

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 307 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SRIPRASHANTH V., AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, S/O. M.VASUDEVAIAH, R/AT NO.87, ARALIMARA ROAD, CHALLAGHTTA VILLAGE, KUMBLAGODU, KENGERI, BANGALORE-560 060. (BY SRI. PRABHAKAR L. SHETTY, ADVOCATE) …PETITIONER AND: SMT. LATHA B.S., AGES ABOUT 27 YEARS, W/O PRASHANTH .V, Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:45694 RPFC No. 307 of 2025 HC-KAR D/O SURESH, NOW RESIDING AT SRI. MALLIJKARJUNASWAMY NILAYA, NEAR SRIRANGA SCHOOL, CHETHANA EXTENSION, BATAWADI, TUMAKURU-572102. …RESPONDENT THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SEC.19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 04.10.2025 PASSED ON I.A.NO.II IN Crl. Misc NO.133/2025 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, TUMAKURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SEC.144(1) OF BNSS FOR MAINTENANCE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:45694 RPFC No. 307 of 2025 HC-KAR ORAL ORDER The present RPFC is filed against the interlocutory order passed in I.A.No.2 in Crl. Misc. No.133/2025 dated 04.10.2025 by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Tumakuru.

2.

The office has raised an objection with regard to the maintainability that in the light of Section 19(4) of the Family Court Act, 1984, the RPFC is not maintainable.

3.

The office objection is upheld and the petitioner is permitted to convert the revision petition into a writ petition within a period of one week from the date of receipt of copy of the order.

4.

Accordingly, the RPFC is disposed off for statistical purposes. Registry is directed to return all the documents. Sd/- _________________________ JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI BN/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. RPFC No. 307 of 2025). ← Search more judgments