✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

P B BALAJI

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

This petition is allowed

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22.I have gone through the affidavit filed in support of the petition and I am satisfied with the reasons stated therein and the respondent also has no serious objection for the application petition allowed. This petition is allowed.

Judgment

C.M.P.No.18195 of 2017in C.R.P.No.3279 of 2017P.B.BALAJI,J.This petition has been filed to implead the 2nd respondent herein, namely the Executive Officer, Pandamangalam Town Panchayat as 2nd respondent in the above Revision in C.R.P.No.3279 of 2017.

Operative part

2.

I have gone through the affidavit filed in support of the petition and I am satisfied with the reasons stated therein and the respondent also has no serious objection for the application petition allowed. This petition is allowed.

3.

Mr.A.Surya, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the 2nd respondent.

4.

Post the main case after two weeks.26.09.2024ataNote : Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in the cause title in the above CRP.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments