✦ Madras High Court

Ladathavasi v. & District.3 The Tahsildar, Aathur

P B BALAJI, CHIEF JUSTICEANDP B BALAJI

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Writ Petition is dismissed for default

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

WP(MD). No.23676 of 2016BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Date : 07/04/2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE ANDTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.BALAJIW.P.(MD). No.23676 of 2016 Ladathavasi...Petitioner Vs1 The District Collector, District Collector Office, Dindigul & District.2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Dindigul & District.3 The Tahsildar, Aathur Taluk, Dindigul District.4 The Special Officer, Block Development Office, Aathur Panchayat Union, Campt at Sempatti, Dindigul District....Respondents PRAYER :- Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the order passed by the 4th respondent in 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD). No.23676 of 2016his proceedings in Na.Ka.No. 5791/2016/A4, dated 28.11.2016, and quash the same and further direct the respondents not to demolish the house constructed by the petitioner in S.F.No.224/19 of Thoppampatti Village, Athur Taluk, Dindigul District. For Petitioner : No appearanceFor Respondents : Mr.P.Thilak Kumar, Govt. Pleader.ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble The Chief Justice)None appears for petitioner.2. Writ Petition is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, the connected W.M.P.(MD) No.17006 of 2006 is closed. (K.R.SHRIRAM, C.J.) (P.B.BALAJI, J.) 07.04.2025 NCC : Yes/NoIndex : Yes/No dixit2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD). No.23676 of 2016To1 The District Collector, District Collector Office, Dindigul & District.2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Dindigul & District.3 The Tahsildar, Aathur Taluk, Dindigul District.4 The Special Officer, Block Development Office, Aathur Panchayat Union, Campt at Sempatti, Dindigul District.3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD). No.23676 of 2016 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICEANDP.B.BALAJI, J. dixit WP(MD) No.23676 of 2016 Date : 07/04/20254/4

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Writ Petition is dismissed for default

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments