Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
With the above direction, the Civil Revision Petition stands allowed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. With the above direction, the Civil Revision Petition stands allowed. No costs.15.07.2025Speaking Order/Non-speaking OrderIndex : Yes / NoNeutral Citation : Yes/NovumToThe Subordinate Judge, Gingee.C.R.P.No.1826 of 20252/2
Judgment
CRP.No.1826 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.B. BALAJIC.R.P.No.1826 of 2025M.Purushothaman ... PetitionerVs.
K.Aanandayi2. K.Parirajan3. The Superintending Engineer, TNEB, Villupuram.4. The Executive Engineer, TNEB, Gingee.5. The Assistant Executive Engineer, TNEB, Gingee.6. The Assistant Engineer, TNEB, Eechur Post, Gingee. ... RespondentsPRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, pleased to direct the learned Subordinate Court, Gingee to dispose the suit in O.S.No.114 of 2023 within the time fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Kirthick Rishi1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP.No.1826 of 2025P.B. BALAJI,J. vumORDERPursuant to the order of this Court, dated 30.06.2025, the learned Subordinate Judge, Gingee has sent a letter to the Registry of this Court in D.No.844/2025 dated 07.07.2025, seeking four months time for disposal of O.S.No.114 of 2023.
Considering the reasonable time sought for, I am inclined to direct the Subordinate Judge, Gingee to dispose of O.S.No.114 of 2023 on merits and in accordance with law on or before 28.11.2025
Operative part
With the above direction, the Civil Revision Petition stands allowed. No costs.15.07.2025Speaking Order/Non-speaking OrderIndex : Yes / NoNeutral Citation : Yes/NovumToThe Subordinate Judge, Gingee.C.R.P.No.1826 of 20252/2
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the above direction, the Civil Revision Petition stands allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.