R.Sudarshan Vinayak v. The Authorized Officer,Canara Bank,Tallakulam,Madurai
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
WP(MD). No.12155 of 2023BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Date : 09.04.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE ANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJIW.P.(MD)No.12155 of 2023and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.10400 & 10401 of 2023R.Sudarshan Vinayak ... PetitionerVsThe Authorized Officer, Canara Bank, Tallakulam, Madurai. ... RespondentPRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the respondent dated 10.05.2023 and quash the sameFor Petitioner : Mr.RamsundarvijayrajFor Respondent : Mr.C.DeepakO R D E R(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble the Chief Justice)Counsel states petition has become infructuous.1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD). No.12155 of 20232. Petition is disposed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected interim applications stand closed. [K.R.SHRIRAM, C.J.] [P.B.BALAJI, J.] 09.04.2025NCC : Yes/NoIndex : Yes/NoMRToThe Authorized Officer, Canara Bank, Tallakulam, Madurai.2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD). No.12155 of 2023 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICEANDP.B.BALAJI, J. MR ORDER IN W.P.(MD)No.12155 of 2023 Date : 09.04.20253/3
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.