✦ Bombay High Court

2008 AND STAMP NUMBER (APPLN.) NO.2597 OF 2008 Pratapsingh Rauji Rane, Sanquelim-Goa v. Umakant Dipa Dubashi and 11 ors

Civil Application No. 730 of 2008C L PANGARKAR, SMA C L PAGANARKAR

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

applications are allowed

Judgment

Mr. S. Vehidulla, Advocate for the applicant. Coram :- C. L. PANGARKAR,J. Date : - 21 st March, 2009. P.C. :

1.

These two applications have been filed for condonation of delay and for substitution of legal representatives of the deceased respondent No.7 on record. The respondent No.7 is said to have died on 28.04.2008. The applicants came to know of the death of the respondent on

Operative part

21.08.2008 and immediately thereafter, the application has been filed. In view of this, the delay stands condoned. The legal representatives of the respondent, be brought on record. The respondents have not filed any reply to the application. It seems, therefore, that they have no objection to heirs being brought on record. In view of this, the applications are allowed. 2 SMA C. L. PAGANARKAR,J.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Application No. 730 of 2008). ← Search more judgments