SHAKUNTALA RAGHUVIR PAIGANKAR AND 2 ORS v. ROHIT RAGHUVIR PAIGANKAR AND 3
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
filed within limitation as such, the application is allowed
Judgment
Operative part
Mr. C. Mascarenhas, Advocate for the applicants. Coram:- C. L. PANGARKAR, J. Date:- 28th January, 2009 P.C. Heard counsel for the applicants. None appears for the respondents even though time was granted to file reply, reply has not been filed. Application for substitution of legal representatives of appellant no.1 is filed within limitation as such, the application is allowed. The legal representatives be brought on record. lh/. C. L. PANGARKAR, J.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: filed within limitation as such, the application is allowed
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 28 Jan 2009. The bench was C L PANGARKAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.