Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
The Civil Application is allowed in the
Judgment
Operative part
Civil Application (CAF) No. 494 of 2010 FIRST APPEAL NO. 908 OF 2009 (Union of India ...VERSUS... Sitaram Tukaram Bhoyar) =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr. G.R.Agrawal, Advocate for appellant. Mr. A.K.Saxena, Advocate for respondent/applicant Court's or Judges Order C ORAM DATED : C.L.PANGARKAR, J. : 29th MARCH, 2010. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and respondent/applicant. This application is filed for withdrawal of the amount deposited in the Court towards the Award passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal. The Tribunal has awarded Rs.2,80,000/- towards compensation and has further directed that out of Rs.2,80,000/-, a sum of Rs.80,000/- be paid to the present respondent and rest amount is directed to be deposited in the nationalised bank. The appeal has been admitted. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that in the circumstances, it would not be proper to pay the entire amount to the respondent. In the circumstances, it is directed that a sum of Rs.80,000/- be paid to the respondent. Rest of the 2 amount be deposited in a nationalized bank for a period of five years initially and the same may be renewed from time to time during the pendency of the appeal. The respondent may be paid the interest on the amount deposited with the nationalized bank, for every quarter. The Civil Application is allowed in the
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.