✦ Bombay High Court

Judgment · High Court

C L PANGARKAR

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Letters Patent Appeal No. 165/2008 in Writ Petition No. 1441/2008 (Decided) Chandrakumar Parasmal Chordiya ..vs.. Namdeo Natthu Londe and Ors. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. Saboo, Advocate for respondent nos. 1,18,31,48 and 54. CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA & C. L. PANGARKAR, JJ. DATED : 27 th August, 2008 Today, the matter is fixed for withdrawal. Learned counsel for the respondents, in view of the subsequent development, states that the appeal has become infructuous. Even otherwise, the appellant was not party to the writ petition. The Letters Patent Appeal accordingly disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE kahale

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments