FIRST APPEAL NO v. Shri Ratnakar M. Naik
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. None appears for the appellants in spite of the fact that the notice has been served on the appellants of withdrawal of the power by their Counsel. It appears that 2 the appellants do not want to prosecute the proceedings. They are dismissed for…
Judgment
FIRST APPEAL NO. 184 OF 2001. AND STAMP NUMBER NO. 759 OF 2004 AND FIRST APPEAL NO.184 OF 2001. Shri Pandurang K. S.Kantak (since deceased) rep. By his LRs. a) Smt. Hemlata Pandurang Kantak & Anr. .. Applicants Versus Shri Ratnakar M. Naik r/o.Canacona, Goa & 6 Ors. .. Respondents And Mrs. Shrinivas F. Naik and Other 2 in M.C.A. No.215/2004 and Stamp Number No.759/2004 .. Opponents Mr. T. G. John, Advocate for the respondent Nos. 3,4 & 5. Coram :- C. L. PANGARKAR,J. Date : - 2 nd March
2009. P.C. :
None appears for the appellants in spite of the fact that the notice has been served on the appellants of withdrawal of the power by their Counsel. It appears that 2 the appellants do not want to prosecute the proceedings. They are dismissed for want of prosecution. SMA C. L. PAGANARKAR,J.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.