SHRI. CAJETAN OLIVEIRA v. SMT. VENEZIANA DULCINA FERNANDES
Judgment
SHRI. CAJETAN OLIVEIRA Versus SMT. VENEZIANA DULCINA FERNANDES ... Petitioner ... Respondent Mr. Agnelo F. Diniz, Advocate for the petitioner. Coram:- C. L. PANGARKAR, J. Date:- 25th February, 2009 P.C. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner. He states that the execution proceedings have been withdrawn in the Trial Court and in view of this, the petition has become infructuous. The petition is disposed of as infructuous. SMA C. L. PANGARKAR, J.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 57 of 2009).
← Search more judgments