✦ Bombay High Court

Remedios Fernandes v. Dr. Alfred Costa and 6 Ors

C L PANGARKAR, SMA C L PAGANARKAR

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

reasons stated in the applications, both the applications are allowed

Judgment

Operative part

Mr. A. F. Diniz, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. M.S.Usgaonkar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Iftikhar Agha, Advocate for the respondent Nos. 1 And 2. Coram :- C. L. PANGARKAR,J. Date : - 3 rd February, 2009. P.C. : This is an application for restoration of the application, which is filed for bringing L.Rs. on record and which came to be dismissed for default. It seems that there is delay in preferring this application and the applicant seeks to condone that delay also. For the reasons stated in the applications, both the applications are allowed. The delay stands condoned. The application for bringing L.Rs. on record, stands restored to file. SMA C. L. PAGANARKAR,J. 2

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments