✦ Bombay High Court

AND Deputy Collector (L.A.) v. Land Acquisition Officer, Panaji & Anr.

Civil Application No. 39 of 2009C L PANGARKAR, SMA C L PAGANARKAR

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

In view of this, these applications are allowed

Key paragraphs

  • Para 11. These applications have been moved by the applicant/ State for substitution of legal representatives of the respondent No.2, who is said to have died on 12.03.2003. The appellants were not aware of the death of the respondent. The respondent No.2's heirs have appeared before…

Judgment

Shri Anthony Viegas (Deceased) through LR's .. Respondents Mr. G. Shirodkar, Government Advocate for the applicant. Coram :- C. L. PANGARKAR,J. Date : - 20 th February, 2009. P.C. :

Operative part

1.

These applications have been moved by the applicant/ State for substitution of legal representatives of the respondent No.2, who is said to have died on 12.03.2003. The appellants were not aware of the death of the respondent. The respondent No.2's heirs have appeared before the Court and have filed their reply to this application for condonation of delay and setting aside abatement. They have no objection to delay being condoned and abatement being set aside. In view of this, these applications are allowed. SMA C. L. PAGANARKAR,J. 2

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Application No. 39 of 2009). ← Search more judgments