BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 6067/2011 (NARAYANRAO WAMANRAO SANAP v. ADDL. COMMISSIONER (SUPPLY), AMRAVATI) & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn
Judgment
Operative part
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 6067/2011 (NARAYANRAO WAMANRAO SANAP VERSUS ADDL. COMMISSIONER (SUPPLY), AMRAVATI & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Court's or Judge's orders Shri P.S. Tidke, counsel for the petitioner. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : DECEMBER 9 . , 2011 Shri Tidke, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the petitioner would avail the remedy under Regulation 24 of the Maharashtra Schedule Commodities (Regulation and Distribution) Order, 1975. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is granted. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. JUDGE APTE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.