Judgment · High Court · 2010
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
The Civil Application is allowed and disposed of
Judgment
Operative part
Mr. S.D.Chande h/f. Mr. Badar, Advocate for Applicant. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 30, 2010. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. It would not be necessary to issue notice to the respondent on this civil application as the respondent was not served in the second appeal when the second appeal was dismissed in default. For the reasons stated in the civil application the delay in filing the application for restoration of the second appeal is condoned. The Civil Application is allowed and disposed of. MCA ST.NO. 13284/2010. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. It would not be necessary to issue notice to the respondent on this civil application as the respondent was not served in the second appeal when the second appeal was dismissed in default. For the reasons stated in the civil application the Second Appeal is restored to file subject to payment of costs of Rs.five hundred in the High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee, Nagpur. The M.C.A. is allowed in the aforesaid terms and disposed of. RR. JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The Civil Application is allowed and disposed of
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 30 Sep 2010. The bench was VASANTI A NAIK.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.