BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 5641/2007 (Sunanda Prakash Pawar v. The State of Maharashtra, thro. Secretary (Labour) ) & Anr.
Judgment
Mr. A.S. Jaiswal, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Sonak, Assistant Government Pleader for respondents. CORAM : D.D.SINHA AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 07, 2008. The counsel for the petitioner states that in the instant petition, the representation of the petitioner for redressal of grievance made in the petition is pending with respondent no.1, and therefore, the petitioner is seeking simplicitor direction to respondent no.1 to decide the same within a stipulated period. In the backdrop of the above referred facts, we dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.1 to dispose of the representation dated
20.10.2006, annexed to the petition as Annexure E, if not decided earlier, on its own merit according to law and procedure prescribed in this behalf, within a period 2 of 8 weeks from the date of communication of this order. JUDGE JUDGE APTE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.