3136/2010 IN S.A. ST No. 19657/2009 (REJECTED S.A. No.78/2010) (Ramu Natthu Tulaskar v. Smt.Yamunabai wd/o Gangaramji (Dead) thr. Lrs Shri Prabhakar Gangadharrao Kale) & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
The civil application is allowed and disposed of
Judgment
Operative part
CAO NO. 434/2010 IN MCA ST. NO. 3136/2010 IN S.A. ST No. 19657/2009 (REJECTED S.A. No.78/2010) (Ramu Natthu Tulaskar VERSUS Smt. Yamunabai wd/o Gangaramji (Dead) thr. Lrs Shri Prabhakar Gangadharrao Kale & others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Court's or Judge's orders Mrs. Kshirsagar, counsel for the applicant. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : APRIL . 19, 2010 Heard. It would not be necessary to issue notice to the respondents on this civil application as the registration of the second appeal was refused for non removal of certain objections. Hence, for the reasons stated in the civil application, the delay in filing the application for restoration is condoned. The civil application is allowed and disposed of. M.C.A. ST. NO. 3136/2010. Heard. It would not be necessary to issue notice to the respondents on this civil application as the registration of the second appeal was refused for non removal of certain objections. 2 Hence, for the reasons stated in the civil application, the second appeal is restored to file subject to the payment of costs of Rupees Five Hundred only, in the High Court Legal Services Sub Committee, Nagpur within a period of ten days. The miscellaneous civil application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and disposed of. APTE JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The civil application is allowed and disposed of
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 19 Apr 2010. The bench was VASANTI A NAIK.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.