KRANTI EDUCATION SOCIETY v. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER, E.P.F. & Ors.

the counsel for the respondent no.1 can be of some assistance to the case of the respondent no.1. In the result, the writ petition fails and is dismissed with no order as to costs. APTE JUDGE 4 WP2489-12 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2489/2012 (KRANTI EDUCATION SOCIETY VERSUS ASSTT. COMMISSIONER, E.P.F. & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri D.S. Wasnik, counsel for the petitioner. Shri H.N. Verma, counsel For the R-1. Shri D.M. Kale, A.G.P. For the R-2 & 3. Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : DECEMBER 4 . , 2012 C.A.W. NO.2517/2012. Heard. The proposed amendment, for the first time, raises grounds based on facts. The petitioner cannot be permitted to raise factual grounds for the first time in the writ jurisdiction. The grounds raised in the proposed amendment are an afterthought and a lame attempt on the part of the petitioner to challenge the impugned order. The amendment application is, therefore, rejected. C.A.W. NO.2618/2012. In view of the dismissal of the writ petition, the civil application stands disposed of. APTE JUDGE