✦ Bombay High Court · 25 Mar 2010

Judgment · High Court · 2010

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

application shall stand dismissed

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. The applicant to file application for condonation of delay within four weeks from today. In case, 2 such application is not filed, present application shall stand dismissed without back reference to the Court. Consequently the appeal shall also stand abated against respondent No.3.

Judgment

and Adv. Shri D.M. Hangre h/f. Adv. Shri R.S. Deshmukh for respondent Nos. 4 to 7 are present.

#2. This is an application for bringing legal representatives of respondent No.3 on record. There is delay of 3259 days in filing application for bringing legal representatives on record. No separate application for condonation of delay is filed.

#3. The applicant to file application for condonation of delay within four weeks from today. In case, 2 such application is not filed, present application shall stand dismissed without back reference to the Court. Consequently the appeal shall also stand abated against respondent No.3.

#4. In case, the application for condonation of delay is filed within four weeks, the matter may be placed before this Court after five weeks. [P.R. BORKAR,J.] snk/2010/MAR10/ca12779.09

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: application shall stand dismissed

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 25 Mar 2010. The bench was P R BORKAR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Application No. 12779 of 2009). ← Search more judgments