Judgment · High Court · 2010
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. Adv. Shri V.S. Badakh h/f. Adv. Shri P.R. Deshmukh for the applicant and Adv. Shri M.S. Shaikh h/f. Adv. Shri A.S. Bajaj for some of the respondents are present. This is an application for condonation of delay in bringing legal representatives of respondent No.2…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6230 OF 1996 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 182 OF 1988 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : P.R. BORKAR,J. DATED : 08.06.2010
#1. Adv. Shri V.S. Badakh h/f. Adv. Shri P.R. Deshmukh for the applicant and Adv. Shri M.S. Shaikh h/f. Adv. Shri A.S. Bajaj for some of the respondents are present. This is an application for condonation of delay in bringing legal representatives of respondent No.2 and for setting aside abatment. For the reasons given in para 4, this application deserves to be condoned. Hence, the application is allowed; abatment set aside and legal representatives of respondent No.2 be brought on record. [P.R. BORKAR, J.] snk/2010/JUN10/ca6230.96
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.