Judgment · High Court · 2009
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. In the circumstances, application is dismissed. Date:26.06.2009 pnd/ca5758.00. (P.R.BORKAR,J.)
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Civil Application No.5758 of 2000 In Civil Appln. (St.) No.11136 of 1999 In Second Appeal (St.)No. 11135 of 1999 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders None present for the applicant. Shri R.C. Patil, Advocate, for Respondent No. 2. This application is already dismissed or abated against Respondent Nos. 1, 3 to 9, 11 and 12 and only Respondent Nos. 2 and 10 are on record. Application prays for setting aside the order of the Registrar dated 3.12.1999 refusing to condone the delay and register civil application which is on stamp number. The very history of this application, whereby it came to be abated and dismissed as 2 against ten respondents, really shows that the applicant is not so serious about this litigation.
#2. In the circumstances, application is dismissed. Date:26.06.2009 pnd/ca5758.00. (P.R.BORKAR,J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.