✦ Bombay High Court · 07 Apr 2022

IN CAST/2282/2021 v. ABDUL IBRAHIM SOFISAHEB BANEMIYA SAHEB DIED LRS. MARUF ABDUL

CA- No. 5257 of 2022MANGESH S PATIL

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. The applications are in time. For the reasons mentioned in the applications, applications are allowed, subject to the condition that the appellants-applicants removes the office objections within two weeks from today failing which this order shall stand recalled automatically without reference to the court.…

Judgment

1.

These are applications for restoration of civil applications for condoning the delay in filing review applications in Second Appeal Nos. 239 of 904-905 & 906 CA--5257-2022 IN CAST-2282-2021.odt 2002, 238 of 2002 and 240 of 2002 respectively, which are dismissed for not removing office objections by the order dated 22 September 2021 passed by the Registrar (Judicial).

2.

The learned advocate for the applicants submits that the applicants would now remove the office objections within two weeks.

4.

The applications are in time. For the reasons mentioned in the applications, applications are allowed, subject to the condition that the appellants-applicants removes the office objections within two weeks from today failing which this order shall stand recalled automatically without reference to the court. ( MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) Tandale/-

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CA- No. 5257 of 2022). ← Search more judgments