NITIN SUMATILAL SANGHAVI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 12 WRIT PETITION NO. 10312 OF 2024 NITIN SUMATILAL SANGHAVI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Wagh Mukulanand R. AGP for Respondents: Mr. M.M. Nerlikar ... CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR , JJ. DATE : 25.11.2024 PER COURT : Leave is granted to amend the nomenclature of respondent no. 2. The amendment is to be carried out forthwith.
The petitioner’s appeal preferred under Section 47 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, has been pending with respondent no. 2, since July 2021.
We dispose of the writ petition directing respondent no. 2 to decide the petitioner’s appeal (Exh. F), as expeditiously as possible and in any case within eight weeks. ( PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) mkd/-
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 — s. 47.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 25 Nov 2024. The bench was MANGESH S PATIL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.