✦ Bombay High Court · 16 Sep 2022

2017 VAIBHAV PRAKASH KOLI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ... AGP & Ors. v. MARNE, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) habeeb

Writ Petition No. 10834 of 2017MANGESH S PATIL, SANDEEP V MARNE

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

Para 22. Since nobody is present for the petitioner, the matter is dismissed in default. (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) habeeb

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.10834 OF 2017 VAIBHAV PRAKASH KOLI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... AGP for Respondent/State: Ms. Vaishali N. Patil Jadhav … CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL AND SANDEEP V. MARNE, JJ. PER COURT : DATE : 16.09.2022 Though the petition is specially listed by issuing a notice in advance, none is present for the petitioner.

Since nobody is present for the petitioner, the matter is dismissed in default. (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) habeeb

Find similar cases Start drafting free

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 10834 of 2017). ← Search more judgments

Judgment

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

Related cases why they’re linked — not procedural history

Continue researching