Judgment · High Court
Judgment
1712.25wp(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 958 WRIT PETITION NO. 1712 OF 2025ARVIND NARAYAN BAGUL AND OTHERSVERSUSTHE SECRETARY RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ANDOTHERS ….Mr Prakash M. Shinde, Advocate h/f Mr Prashant B. Jadhav, Advocate for petitioners Mr S. V. Hange, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 to 8/State CORAM : MANGESH S. PATILAND PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, JJ. DATE : 5th February, 2025PER COURT:1.Heard.2. The petitioners, who were serving as muster assistants areaggrieved by the fact that the pension papers are being prepared fromthe date they were confirmed/regularized instead of their initial date ofappointment.3. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable forthwith.4. The learned A.G.P. waives service of notice forrespondents/State authorities.
1712.25wp(2) 5. We dispose of the writ petition, directing respondentNos.1 to 8 to consider and take a decision in accordance with law onthe petitioners’ representations/request dated 18/10/2024 and28/10/2024, albeit those are notices issued through an advocate, bytreating them as their representation.6.The decision shall be taken as expeditiously as possibleand in any case within a period of twelve weeks.(PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.)sjk
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.