✦ Bombay High Court · 25 Jun 2012

Judgment · High Court · 2012

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1949 OF 2012 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s order Court’s or Judge’s orders CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI AND SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE : JUNE 25, 2012 P.C. 1] The matter is received upon transfer from the Principal Seat. 2] Shri Nikam appears for respondent No.2. Shri V.D. Rakh, AGP appears for respondent Nos. 3 and 4. 3] Petitioner has chosen not to engage any Advocate though he is served with notice. 4] Dismissed for want of prosecution. [SUNIL P.DESHMUKH,J.] [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] GRT/-

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 1949 of 2012). ← Search more judgments