✦ Bombay High Court

Writ Petition No. 1648 of 2010 · Bombay High Court

Writ Petition No. 1648 of 2010V R KINGAONKAR

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Petition is disposed of

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner’s case is that the property involved in the matter pertaining to proceedings u/s 54 of the Wakfs Act, 1995, is not at all part and parcel of the Wakf property, but it is his own property. He would submit regarding encroachment can not be decided without deciding the nature of ownership at the first stage. It would be, therefore, in the interest of justice to direct the authority to proceed with the inquiry only after determining the question of ownership. The learned Chief Executive Officer of 2 Board of Wakf shall, therefore, frame preliminary issue pertaining to objection raised by the petitioner and only after passing speaking order on the issue of ownership in respect of the property – Survey Nos.101 and 102 (Gut Nos.332 and 333), he may further proceed to deal with the application for removal of encroachment. Petition is disposed of. (V. R. KINGAONKAR , J) Dt/- 12.07.2010 ndk/c1271023

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Wakfs Act, 1995 — s. 54.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 1648 of 2010). ← Search more judgments