Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- S SOUNTHAR
Outcome
Withdrawn
In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Wakfs Act, 1995
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Ali Moideen6. Janab R.Ayub Khan7. Janaba M. ... RespondentsPage 1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.19815 of 2020 Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to initiate appropriate action under the…
Judgment
W.P.No.19815 of 2020IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated 29.11.2024CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHARW.P.No.19815 of 2020 andWMP No.24480 of 2020M.Shahul Hameed ... PetitionerVs.
Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, Represented by Chief Executive Officer, No.1, Jaffar Sarang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai 600 001.
Superintendent of Wakfs, No.4A-5A, Tippu Sulthan Market, First Agraharam, Salem Zone, Salem 636 001.
Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Chief Secretary, Fort St. George, Chennai 600009.
Muthavalli, Jamia Masjid Pallivasal, M.G.Road, Hosur, Krishnagiri District.
Operative part
Ali Moideen6. Janab R.Ayub Khan7. Janaba M. ... RespondentsPage 1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.19815 of 2020 Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to initiate appropriate action under the provisios of the Wakfs Act, 1995 for cancellation of lease granted by the fourth respondent to and in favour of the 5th respondent with respect to an extent of 1.23 acres of land comprised in Survey No.399/3A situated at Mookanapallai Village, Hosur, Krishnagiri District and to conduct an enquiry for grant of lease with respect to the subject land pursuant o the applications of the petitioner dated 31.01.2018 and 12.07.2018 and also following the Resolution No.162/18 dated 02.11.2018 passed by the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.14259/01/Aa2/Ki.Kiri and grant lease to and in favour of the petitioner. For Petitioner: Mr.S.SadasharamFor Respondents: Mr.Mohammed Fayaz Ali for first and second respondents Mr.G.Ameediaz, Government Advocate for third respondentPage 2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.19815 of 2020ORDERToday, when the matter was listed for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and to that effect, he has also made an endorsement.2. In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.29.11.2024Index: Yes/NoInternet: Yes/No mstTo1. The Chief Executive Officer, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, No.1, Jaffar Sarang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai 600 001.2. Superintendent of Wakfs, No.4A-5A, Tippu Sulthan Market, First Agraharam, Salem Zone, Salem 636 001. Page 3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.19815 of 20203. Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Chief Secretary, Fort St. George, Chennai 600009.4. Muthavalli, Jamia Masjid Pallivasal, M.G.Road, Hosur, Krishnagiri District. Page 4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.19815 of 2020S.SOUNTHAR, J.mstW.P.No.19815 of 202029.11.2024Page 5 of 5
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Wakfs Act, 1995.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.