✦ Bombay High Court · 26 Jun 2012

THE SANJIVANI (TAKLI) SAH SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & Ors.

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Petition is disposed of accordingly

Judgment

THE SANJIVANI (TAKLI) SAH SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ... Advocate for Petitioner : Mr.Hon Vinayak D. AGP for Respondent nos.1 to 4 : Mr.S.K.Tambe CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI AND SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE : JUNE 26, 2012 P.C.: Perused order dated 18th June, 2012. The petitioner has to obtain appropriate clarification from the Bench which has passed earlier orders dated 6th January, 2011. In this situation, upon instructions, Advocate Mr.Hon states that, obtaining clarification and thereafter obtaining orders on merit, may consume a considerable time and the petitioner may miss chance to take advantage of the policy decision under which, interest waiver is available. He submits that the last date for applying under it, is 30th June, 2012. For these reasons, the petitioner wishes to withdraw the petition. Therefore, 2 726-12-wp.odt upon instructions, Mr.Hon seeks leave to withdraw the petition. 2] Hence, to enable the petitioner to take advantage of the scheme as formulated, we permit the petitioner to withdraw the petition. Petition is disposed of accordingly. 3] Pending Civil Application, if any, stands disposed of. 4] Authenticated copy of this order be supplied to the parties requesting therefor. [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] kbp/

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is disposed of accordingly

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 26 Jun 2012. The bench was ARMADHIKARI, SUNIL P DESHMUKH, B P DHARMADHIKARI.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Ca No. 7082 of 2012). ← Search more judgments