✦ Bombay High Court · 29 Jul 2010

Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak v. The Security Guards Board for Greater

Writ Petition No. 2305 of 2009SHMUKH, R P SONDURBALDOTA, D K DESHMUKH

Judgment

.... Mr. Sushil Mahadeshwar i/b. Ms. Ranjana Todankar for the petitioner. Ms. Lata Desai i/b. Ms. Pallavi Divekar for Respondent No.1 Mr. Punit B. Anand for Respondent No.2. .... CORAM : D. K. DESHMUKH AND SMT. R. P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. DATED : JULY 29, 2010. P.C. Heard learned counsel appearing for both sides. Learned counsel for respondent states that the application submitted by the petitioner will be decided in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of six months from today. In view of this statement made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent, no orders are necessary. Writ Petition disposed of. SMT. R. P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. D. K. DESHMUKH, J. 2 wp2305-09

Find similar cases Start drafting free

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Related cases why they’re linked — not procedural history

Why is this linked?

Continue researching

Connect this judgment to its cited authorities, statutes, and related legal questions.

Follow cited cases Browse research topics Explore statutes & sections
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 2305 of 2009). ← Search more judgments