✦ Bombay High Court · 21 Nov 2009

Union of India & Anr. v. Dr.Maheshkumar J.Vaishya & Anr.

Civil Application No. 2813 of 2009K K TATED, D K DESHMUKH

Judgment

Mr.Shrishailya S.Deshmukh, for Applicant. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & K.K.TATED, JJ. DATED: 21st November,2009 P.C.:-

1. In view of the affidavit filed by One Sandesh Desai who claims to be the clerk of Advocate Shri.S.S.Deshmukh, Civil application is granted in terms of prayer clause (a). (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (K.K.TATED, J.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY 2 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8943 OF 2007

1. Union of India & anr. ...Applicants. vs.

1.

Dr.Maheshkumar J.Vaishya & anr. ...Respondents. Mr.Shrishailya S.Deshmukh, for Applicant. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & K.K.TATED, JJ. DATED: 21st November,2009 P.C.:- Rule. Rule on interim relief returnable after six weeks. Ad-interim order in terms of prayer clause (b). (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)

(K.K.TATED, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Application No. 2813 of 2009). ← Search more judgments