RAMESHBHAI TALSIBHAI PATEL v. COMPETENT AUTHORITY & DEPUTY COLLECTOR
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 29 Oct 1999
- Bench
- S K KESHOTE
Outcome
Dismissed
Civil Application is dismissed as abated
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- RAMESHBHAI TALSIBHAI PATEL Versus COMPETENT AUTHORITY & DEPUTY COLLECTOR -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR PM BHATT for Petitioner MR MUKESH A PATEL, AGP for Respondent No. 1, 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE…
Judgment
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================
Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements?
To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement?
Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
Operative part
Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- RAMESHBHAI TALSIBHAI PATEL Versus COMPETENT AUTHORITY & DEPUTY COLLECTOR -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR PM BHATT for Petitioner MR MUKESH A PATEL, AGP for Respondent No. 1, 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE Date of decision: 29/10/1999 ORAL JUDGEMENT (cid:9)Mr.Bhatt states that the petitioner is in possession of the disputed land. On the record of this Special Civil Application learned counsel for the respondents submitted a letter dated 29.10.1999. After reading this letter, he submits that the possession of this disputed land is with the petitioner. In view of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999, this Special Civil Application abates. This Special Civil Application is dismissed as abated. Rule discharged. Interim relief, if any, granted stands vacated. No order as to costs. (cid:9) (cid:9)(S.K.Keshote,J.) (pathan)(cid:9) (cid:9) (cid:9) (cid:9)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Civil Application is dismissed as abated
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India; Repeal Act, 1999.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gujarat High Court, on 29 Oct 1999. The bench was S K KESHOTE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.