SEHGAL TEXTILE WORKS v. STATE OF GUJARAT
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. Special Civil Application No. 1422 of 1993 MR MG NAGARKAR for Petitioner No. 1 MS SONAL VYAS AGP for Respondent No. 1 RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA Date of decision: 31/07/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT #. Learned AGP, Ms.Sonal Vyas…
Judgment
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA ============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates, Judge/Judges, Tribunal/Tribunals? --------------------------------------------------------- SEHGAL TEXTILE WORKS Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
Special Civil Application No. 1422 of 1993 MR MG NAGARKAR for Petitioner No. 1 MS SONAL VYAS AGP for Respondent No. 1 RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA Date of decision: 31/07/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT #. Learned AGP, Ms.Sonal Vyas places on record reply affidavit dated 17.1.2000 filed by Shri Maganbhai B. Patel, Competent Authority and Additional Collector, ULC, Surat and states that respondents have already taken over the possession of the land and the land in question is vested in the Government and no right title remains in the hands of the petitioner. #. In view of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999 coming into force, this petition has practically become infructuous and accordingly it is dismissed. Rule discharged. Interim relief, if any, granted earlier stands vacated with no order as to costs. (cid:9) (cid:9)(B.J.Shethna, J.) *Pvv (cid:9) (cid:9)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India; Repeal Act, 1999.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gujarat High Court, on 31 Jul 2002. The bench was B SHETHNA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.