HUSENBHAI FIDAHUSSAIN v. STATE OF GUJARAT
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 25 Jun 2004
- Bench
- R K ABICHANDANI
Outcome
Disposed of
matter, the petition is disposed of as having become
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. Special Civil Application No. 105 of 1991 MR ARUN H MEHTA for Petitioner No. 1-3 MR RC KODEKAR, AGP for Respondent No. 1-2 DELETED for Respondent No. 3-5 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI Date of decision: 25/06/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT (cid:9)The learned counsel for…
Judgment
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI ============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates, Judge/Judges, Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- HUSENBHAI FIDAHUSSAIN Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
Operative part
Special Civil Application No. 105 of 1991 MR ARUN H MEHTA for Petitioner No. 1-3 MR RC KODEKAR, AGP for Respondent No. 1-2 DELETED for Respondent No. 3-5 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI Date of decision: 25/06/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT (cid:9)The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the provisions of Section-4 of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999, the proceedings relating to the order made under the Act have abated and, therefore, the petition has become infructuous. The learned counsel also states that possession of the land in question has not been taken over. It is pointed out that there was ad-interim stay granted in terms of para-12(C) of the petition staying further proceedings in the matter. In this view of the matter, the petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. Ad-interim relief stands vacated with liberty to move in case of difficulty. (cid:9) (cid:9)[R.K. ABICHANDANI, J.] pirzada/- (cid:9) (cid:9)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: matter, the petition is disposed of as having become
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India; Repeal Act, 1999.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gujarat High Court, on 25 Jun 2004. The bench was R K ABICHANDANI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.