Mrigendra Kumar & Anr. v. The Union Of India & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
The application is dismissed
Judgment
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chitranjan Sinha, Sr. Adv. Mr. Manish Kr. Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA) 2 10-05-2013 We have heard counsel for the petitioners and the Railways. We are not satisfied that in the garb of Public Interest Litigation, we possess the expertise to decide the location of Railway station. If the petitioners are aggrieved they can pursue their remedy appropriately before the concerned Forum. The application is dismissed. (Navin Sinha, J) (Shivaji Pandey, J) P. Kumar/-
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.