Subh Narayan Tiwary v. The State Of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
The application is allowed
Judgment
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA ORAL ORDER 2 12-12-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. This application has been filed for review of the order dated 11.04.2012 in C.W.J.C. No. 5306 of 2012. Referring to the records of the writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that 16.10.2007 was the date the benefit of ACP was granted. It was annulled by order dated
Operative part
14.07.2011. The statement in paragraph-1 of the writ application to the contrary was an inadvertent error. He invites the attention of the Court to Annexures- 3 and 4 of the writ petition in support of Patna High Court MJC No.5304 of 2012 (2) dt.12-12-2012 his submission. The order dated 11.04.2012 is modified to the extent that the date 16.10.2007 mentioned in that order at both pages be corrected to read as 14.07.2011. The application is allowed. (Navin Sinha, J.) Md. Ibrarul/-
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.