Ayodhya Prasad Yadav v. The Collector, Purnea
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 2323. 01-05-2013 It was jointly submitted by learned counsel for the parties that since the present writ petition pertains to a dispute under Section 48 E of the Bihar Tenancy Act, 1885, this matter may be referred to the Land Tribunal, constituted and functioning under…
Judgment
.... .... Respondents ================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeeva Roy Mr. Shree Ganesh For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Gp2) Mr. Arun Prasad Ambastha Mr. Ravindra Kumar Choudhary Mr. Rupesh Ranjan ================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
01-05-2013 It was jointly submitted by learned counsel for the parties that since the present writ petition pertains to a dispute under Section 48 E of the Bihar Tenancy Act, 1885, this matter may be referred to the Land Tribunal, constituted and functioning under the Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009. Accordingly, in view of submission made by learned counsel for the parties as well as in view of 2 Patna High Court CWJC No.14238 of 2002 (23) dt.01-05-2013 provision contained in Section 15 of the Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009, the Registry is directed to transmit the record of the case to the Land Tribunal forthwith. (Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009 — s. 15.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Patna High Court, on 01 May 2013. The bench was RAKESH KUMAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.