Rajesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The writ petition stands disposed of granting
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. 01-03-2013 Sri Jitendra Kishore Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner, after some argument, submits that the petitioner may be allowed to approach the Land Tribunal, which has been constituted under the Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009. The prayer is allowed. The writ petition stands…
Judgment
…….Respondent 1st Set. 5. Smt. Kanti Devi, W/o Rameshwar Prasad, Resident of Village and P.O. Khiriawan, P.S. Magadh Medical College, District – Gaya. ……….Respondent 2nd Set. (Pre-emptor)
Tilotama Devi, W/o Sri Krishneshwar Singh.
Mostt. Shanti Devi, W/o Late Parasnath Singh. Both residents of Village and P.O.-Kendui, P.S. Magadh Medical College, District Gaya. …………….Respondent 3rd Set (Vendors) .... .... Respondents ================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Kishore Verma For the Respondent/s : Mr. (GA-9) ================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
Operative part
01-03-2013 Sri Jitendra Kishore Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner, after some argument, submits that the petitioner may be allowed to approach the Land Tribunal, which has been constituted under the Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009. The prayer is allowed. The writ petition stands disposed of granting 2 Patna High Court CWJC No.4280 of 2013 (2) dt.01-03-2013 liberty to the petitioner to approach the Tribunal. It is made clear that period consumed while pursing the present writ petition i.e. from 26-02-2013 till today, may be excluded while considering limitation matter. (Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition stands disposed of granting
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.