Nagina Sahni & Ors. v. Kari Sahani & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as incompetent
Judgment
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Umakant Pd. No-1 Mr. H.K.Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER 11 29-10-2013 No body appears on behalf of the appellants. Perused the office note from which it transpires that this appeal stood dismissed for non-compliance of the order dated
Operative part
02.05.2006 as against respondent nos. 14 and 17 to 34. This appeal arises out a suit for partition at the instance of the plaintiff against the decree of dismissal of the suit. The respondent nos. 14 and 17 to 34 were impleaded as defendant nos. 14 and 17 to 34 in the suit and from the impugned judgment, it transpires that these defendants had contested the suit. After the dismissal of this appeal as against those respondents, proceeding further with this appeal may result in inconsistent orders and decrees. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as incompetent. Nitesh/- (V. Nath, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.