Subodh Kumar Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail granted
let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 120(B), 147, 148, 149, 188, 224, 225, 307, 323, 324, 332, 333, 337, 338, 353, 427, 435, 436, 448, 504
- Arms Act, 1959 s. 27
- Explosive Substance Act ss. 3, 4
Judgment
Operative part
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER 2 07-10-2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody since 07.05.2013, in connection with Madhubani Town P.S. Case No. 329 of 2012 under Sections 188, 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 224, 225, 448, 337, 338, 435, 436, 332, 333, 353, 120(B), 427, 307, 504 of the IPC, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 3/4 of the Explosive Substance Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR. The allegation is that the petitioner was member of the mob who committed ruckus as alleged. No specific overt act has been alleged against the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38563 of 2013 (2) dt.07-10-2013 2 bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Madhubani Town P.S. Case No. 329 of 2012, subject to the condition that the petitioner will be well represented on each date in the court below and his failure to do so on two sequential dates shall result in cancellation of his bail bonds. (V. Nath, J.) KKSINHA/-
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 120(B), 147, 148, 149, 188, 224, 225, 307, 323, 324, 332, 333, 337, 338, 353, 427, 435, 436, 448, 504; Arms Act, 1959 — s. 27; Explosive Substance Act — ss. 3, 4.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.