M/S Chitra Developers & Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Adharshila Complex, South v. The Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
The appeal is dismissed for non-
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Shree Satish Kumar Singh, Electrical Executive Engineer A.P.T., Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Kaushalesh Choudhary, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1012 of 2005 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7471 of 2005 ====================================================== M/S Chitra Developers & Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Adharshila Complex, South Gandhi Maidan, Near Reserve Bank of India, through its Chief Executive Subhash Kumar, son of Shri Someshwar Lal. .... .... Appellant/s Versus 1. The Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna through its Chairman, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.
The Superintending Engineer, Patna Electricity Supply Undertaking, Patna West Division, Patna.
Operative part
Shree Satish Kumar Singh, Electrical Executive Engineer A.P.T., Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Kaushalesh Choudhary, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA) 4 09-04-2013 No one appears for the appellant. Even after the appeal was restored pursuant to the earlier dismissal for non-prosecution. Learned counsel for the Board is present. It is apparent that the appellant has no interest in pursuing matters seriously. The appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. In any application for restoration, it shall be obligatory for the appellant to annex a copy of the present order. K.C.jha/- (Navin Sinha, J) (Shivaji Pandey, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.