Anju Devi @ Anju Singh v. The State of Bihar through Sri Pratyaya Amrit, the Principal Secretary, Road
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. Sri Parmanand Jha, The Land Acquisition Officer, Gaya. Sri Anuj Kumar, The Circle Officer, Manpur, Block- Gaya. Sri Chandra Prakash, The Circle Inspector, Manpur, Block-Gaya. Sri Mukesh Kumar, The Anchal Amin, Manpur, Block- Gaya. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s…
Judgment
Versus The State of Bihar through Sri Pratyaya Amrit, the Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. Sri Chanchal Kumar, The Director, National Highway, Govt. of India, New Delhi. ... ... Petitioner/s
Dr. Teyag Ranjan, The District Magistrate, Gaya.
Sri Parmanand Jha, The Land Acquisition Officer, Gaya. Sri Anuj Kumar, The Circle Officer, Manpur, Block- Gaya. Sri Chandra Prakash, The Circle Inspector, Manpur, Block-Gaya. Sri Mukesh Kumar, The Anchal Amin, Manpur, Block- Gaya. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR Mr.Vipin Kumar Singh Mr.Sushil Kumar (Gp22) ORAL ORDER 8 03-05-2023 Heard Mr. Vindhyachal Singh, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners and Mr. P.K. Shahi, learned Senior Counsel for the Road Construction Department assisted by Mr. Rajesh Patna High Court MJC No.2 of 2023(8) dt.03-05-2023 Kumar, learned counsel. It has been submitted by the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners that the State may be directed to proceed in accordance with the measurement done by the State. Mr. Shahi has no objection to that. This case is disposed of with the direction to the State authorities to proceed as per the measurement on the basis of the satellite map. The interim order of stay of the project is hereby vacated. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/- U
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.